Mit Raptor Lake hat Intel die Hybrid-Architektur der letzten Generation spürbar weiterentwickelt. Die Leistung des Core i9-13900K und Core i7-13700K liegt nennenswert über dem Core i9-12900K. Beide Raptor-Lake-CPUs schlagen zudem in allen Tests die direkte Konkurrenz von AMD. Damit ist Intel wieder Performance- und Gaming-König, aber auf Kosten eines meist höheren Stromverbrauchs.
Die Jagt hat begonnen! AMD hat dieses Jahr bereits vorgelegt, doch nun zieht Intel nach und kämpft um die Krone der schnellsten Gaming-CPU der Welt. Ob Intel dieses Kunststück gelungen ist, erfahren Sie in diesem ausführlichen Review zum Intel Core i9-13900K und dem Intel Core i5-13600K.
Intel Raptor Lake als Refresh der Alder-Lake-Architektur ist da. Zum Start hat ComputerBase Core i9-13900K, i7-13700K und i5-13600K unter die Lupe genommen: Der Test mit Benchmarks in Apps und Spielen sowie IPC-, Takt- und Effizienz-Analysen vermittelt einen umfassenden Eindruck der neuen Generation – Überraschungen inklusive.
The Intel Core i9-13900K has done something very significant in outperforming the 12th Gen 12900K by a significant margin within just one generation. However, across a lot of benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X maintains a lead over the 13900K. In a lot of benchmarks, the difference isn't much. So for enthusiasts, there are now two very competitive high-end desktop processors to choose from. That's a good place to be in.
The Raptors are out of the cage!
The raptors are here! We're reviewing the Intel Core i9-13900K, which leads the company's new 13th Gen Core "Raptor Lake" desktop processor series. This gains significance as it is the company's final generation of processors built on a monolithic die with a uniform silicon fabrication node, with the CPU cores, iGPU, caches, and platform controllers sitting on a single die. With future generations, Intel is expected to put its IDM 2.0 product development strategy into motion, and we'll see processors made from multi-chip modules (MCMs). The Intel Core i9-13900K in this review doubles down on the Hybrid architecture, which dealt a blow to AMD's leadership in the segment with the 12th Gen "Alder Lake." The idea behind Hybrid is not to chase down AMD's lead with CPU core-counts, as Intel did with the 8th through 11th generations; but to place two distinct kinds of CPU cores, with different performance and power bands. The larger performance cores (or P-cores) handle the most demanding workloads, and Intel calculates that eight of these should suffice, as even workloads such as games don't need more than 16 threads from performance cores; while a Zerg swarm of physically smaller efficient cores (or E-cores), with reasonably high IPC, could help the processor overcome the multi-threaded performance deficit to AMD processors in creator tasks. The E-cores also give the processor a low power footprint in everyday workloads.
The Core i9-13900K offers truly exquisite performance, and it runs a little less hot (overall) than Ryzen 7000. The single-threaded performance, by the way, we find to be really good. It has to be stated that today you'll see very different reviews on performance throughout a lot of media. See, the motherboard manufacturers get to decide how the CPU is configured concerning PL1/PL2 states (the maximum allowed energy consumption during a set timeframe, and these values will differ everywhere. We also noticed that when you run a benchmark, often the score is never 100% the same. We tested on a Z790 motherboard that allows the multi-core configuration to be set at reference specification, and we did that. So you're seeing as close to reference performance as possible. That means on a lot of platforms, this CPU will perform faster and hotter. When we loaded up motherboard optimized defaults, we noticed that that would increase the CPU's heat levels as well, hitting even 100 Degrees C in short bursts. The processor can take that, it will however require satisfactory cooling. It's a somewhat similar story to the top-end Ryzen 7000 SKUs. If you're a gamer, then the new L2 caches do make up for a lot of extra performance, and this is probably also why the 13600K is probably the more exciting processor, be sure to check out that review. Realistically we feel we should call the 13900K with a Z790 motherboard Intel's new HEDT platform for the consumer market. The cost of running that performance will be tailed by heat levels and big numbers in energy consumption. Next to that, the cost of ownership is steep if you convert to a new Z790 platform with DDR5 memory. If you can cool it good enough (Tjmax is 100°C), then the 13900K is listed by Intel at a boost of (up to) 5.8GHz, which we can confirm. So this means that the flagship processor may reach speeds of 5.8 GHz at stock on a small number of performance cores. In an all-core configuration, we noticed 5500 MHz mostly. If you purchase a motherboard that optimizes PL2 states even further and harder, a 360 mm AIO will likely be necessary to keep temperatures below the thermal threshold for more demanding tasks that necessitate pushing the CPU to its maximum when you desire optimal turbo frequencies.
t’s that time of the year again – Intel is launching a brand-new generation of processors – and this is the 13th generation. What we have today is the Core i9-13900K, the current top-of-the-line processor and before we proceed with anything, this is an engineering sample – and that is why the IHS looks different. We have a video format of this article as well, which I highly suggest you watch.
Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr. Die gelisteten Angebote sind keine verbindlichen Werbeaussagen der Anbieter.
* Preise in Euro inkl. MwSt. zzgl. Zahlart- und Versandkosten. Bei der Auswahl von "Preis inkl. Versand" nach Deutschland beinhaltet der Preis die Kosten für Versand und Zahlart. Die nicht angeführten Kosten in andere Länder entnimm bitte der Website des Händlers. Bei Sortierung nach einer anderen als der Landeswährung des Händlers basiert die Währungsumrechnung auf einem von uns ermittelten Tageskurs, der womöglich nicht mit dem im Shop angegebenen Preis exakt übereinstimmt. Bitte bedenke außerdem, dass die angeführten Preise periodisch erzeugte Momentaufnahmen darstellen und technisch bedingt teilweise veraltet sein können. Insbesondere sind Preiserhöhungen zwischen dem Zeitpunkt der Preisübernahme durch uns und dem späteren Besuch dieser Website möglich. Händler haben keine Möglichkeit die Darstellung der Preise direkt zu beeinflussen und sofortige Änderungen auf unserer Seite zu veranlassen. Der maßgebliche Preis für den Verkauf durch den Händler ist der tatsächliche Preis des Produkts, der zum Zeitpunkt des Kaufs auf der Website des Händlers steht.
Letzte Aktualisierung:
Der heise Preisvergleich ist ein Angebot in Kooperation mit der Preisvergleich Internet Services AG (geizhals.de). Die Redaktion von heise online hat keinen Einfluss auf das Angebot. Anfragen bitten wir daher direkt an geizhals.de zu stellen.
Fragen, Kritik und Anregungen bitte per E-Mail oder im Forum. Händler können sich hier anmelden. Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr.
Weitere Kontaktmöglichkeiten zu geizhals.de findst du hier oder telefonisch unter: +43 1 581 16 09